Replacing WCF with AspNetCore Rest API as transport layer for XPO

Replacing WCF with AspNetCore Rest API as transport layer for XPO

I have been using XPO from DevExpress since day one. For me is the best O.R.M in the dot net world, so when I got the news that XPO was going to be free of charge I was really happy because that means I can use it in every project without adding cost for my customers.

Nowadays all my customer needs some type of mobile development, so I have decided to master the combination of XPO and Xamarin

Now there is a problem when using XPO and Xamarin and that is the network topology, database connections are no designed for WAN networks.

Let’s take MS SQL server as an example, here are the supported communication protocols

  • TCP/IP.
  • Named Pipes

To quote what Microsoft web site said about using the protocols above in a WAN network

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/tools/configuration-manager/choosing-a-network-protocol?view=sql-server-2014

Named Pipes vs. TCP/IP Sockets

In a fast-local area network (LAN) environment, Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Sockets and Named Pipes clients are comparable with regard to performance. However, the performance difference between the TCP/IP Sockets and Named Pipes clients becomes apparent with slower networks, such as across wide area networks (WANs) or dial-up networks. This is because of the different ways the interprocess communication (IPC) mechanisms communicate between peers.”

So, what other options do we have? Well if you are using the full DotNet framework you can use WCF.

So, it looks like WCF is the solution here since is mature and robust communication framework but there is a problem, the implementation of WCF for mono touch (Xamarin iOS) and mono droid (Xamarin Android)

You can read about Xamarin limitations in the following links

Android: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/android/internals/limitations

iOS: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/ios/internals/limitations

I don’t want to go into details about how the limitation of each platform affects XPO and WCF but basically the main limitation is the ability to use reflection and emit new code which is needed to generate the WCF client, also in WCF there are problems in the serialization behaviors.

Well now that we know the problem is time to talk about the solution. As you know XPO has a layered architecture ( you can read about that here https://www.jocheojeda.com/2018/10/01/xpo-post-5-layered-architecture/)

So basically, what we need to do is to replace the WCF layer with some other technology to communicate to the database server

The technology I’ve selected for this AspNetCore which I would say is a really nice technology that is modern, multi-platform and easy to use. Here below you can see what is the architecture of the solution

AspNetCore

Rest API

So, what we need basically is to be able to communicate the data layer with the data store through a network architecture.

The network architecture that I have chosen is a rest API which is one of the strong fronts of AspNetCore. The rest API will work as the server that forward the communication from XPO to the Database and vice versa, you can find a project template of the server implementation here https://www.jocheojeda.com/download/560/ this implementation references one nuget where I have written the communication code, you can fine the nuget here https://nuget.bitframeworks.com/feeds/main/BIT.Xpo.AgnosticDataStore.Server/19.1.5.1

Also we need a client that is able to interpret the information from the rest API and feed XPO, for that I have created a special client you can find here https://nuget.bitframeworks.com/feeds/main/BIT.Xpo.AgnosticDataStore.Client/19.1.5.1

The client implementation has been tested in the following platforms

  • Xamarin Android
  • Xamarin iOS
  • Xamarin WPF
  • DotNetCore
  • DotNetFramework

The client implementation has been tested in the following operative systems

  • Android 5 to 9
  • iOS 9 to 11
  • MacOS: Sierra to Catalina
  • Windows 10

In this link, you can see a full implementation of the server and the clients (XAF and Xamarin)

What is next? Well here are a few topics for the upcoming posts

  • Understanding JWT tokens
  • How to secure your data store service with a JWT token
  • Hosting multiple data store with a single service
  • Implementing your own authentication method
  • Examples examples examples

 

XAF javascript callback made easy

Sometimes we need to have clientside events and handle them on the server side code behind, that in a simple asp.net web page is really easy, you just have to execute a javascript that executes an HTTP request to the server. Now the question is, how do we do that in XAF?

Well, the concept is basically the same but you need to know XAF architecture the problem is that most of the code needed is not documented, but after a while, I manage to figure it out, so let’s get started.

1)  Create a XAF web application

2) On your web module add a view controller

3) Implement the interface IXafCallbackHandler on the controller you just added in step 2, this is the method that will be called as a callback from javascript. This interface is not documented on the DevExpress website

4) In your view controller add a property to access XafCallbackManager

5) Override the OnViewControlsCreated method and register your callback, in this example, the name of the callback is “MyScript”

6) Now add a simple action and wire the execute event, on the execute event cast the frame as a web window and register a startup script. The code surrounded with the blue line is the javascript that triggers the callback in the callback manager, the code surrounded with red is the id if the script that we are listening for, it should match the name of the script registered on the handler in the previous step.

To execute the callback somewhere in your javascript you have to execute the following function RaiseXafCallback, this function is not documented on the DevExpress website

RaiseXafCallback(globalCallbackControl, 'TheIdOfYourHandler', 'AnyStringThatRepresentsTheValuesYouWantToPassToTheCallBack', '', false);

7) Run your application and execute the simple action added in step 6, when the javascript finish executing, the method you implemented on step 3 will be executed.

 

The code for this article is here  the full example is in GitHub

 

 

 

 

XAF FilterController case insensitive search

Sometimes you are asked by a customer to implement a functionality that you have already created in the past from someone else.

In this case, a customer and dear friend from Italy asked me “Jose, can we make the XAF filter case insensitive?”

And my answer was yes, I have done in the past for a customer in El Salvador. At that time the approach we used was to save everything in uppercases and do all the searches in uppercases also

I didn’t like that approach at all, so it was time get creative again.

As always I start my research by spending some time reading tickets at https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/ which is the greatest source of information for all things related to DevExpress

Here is what I found

  1. https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q356778/how-can-i-activate-case-insensitive-search-in-lookup-views this approach actually works but the problem is that the name of the fields are hardcoded
  2. https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q343797/root-listview-filterbytext-include-the-collection-propertys this second approach just append extra nodes to the criteria so its also not good but what I have learned with this example is when is the right moment to alter the criteria.

My first idea was to edit the criteria that were sent to the collection source that means that I need a way to get the values of each node on the criteria, so I can edit them one by one. After some more research, this is what I have found

https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q539396/criteriaoperator-how-to-get-list-of-parameters-and-their-values

this approach seems perfect to get the properties and values of each node till test it and find out this

Michael (DevExpress Support)6 years ago

It is possible to write a hierarchy walker or visitor, but only for a specific subset of criteria operators.

What Michael means is that only you can only get the values of simple criteria and by simple, I mean the ones that do not involve functions. So, I was set back to step one again.

So, I’m back to step one but let’s see what I’ve learned from the other tickets

  1. I know the exact moment when the criteria are evaluated
  2. I know the criteria that are evaluated and how many nodes it contains
  3. I know which the possible properties are involved in the creation of the criteria

Now this is the flow that I will use to make the search case insensitive

  1. Locate the controller where the search action lives, for that, I can use the property frame and the method get controller
  2. Interrupt the search action, for that, I will wire the event execute of the FilterController FullTextFilterAction action
  3. Find out what are the possible properties that I can use to build the search criteria for that I will use GetFullTextSearchProperties
  4. Build the new criteria, this is somehow tricky because the properties shown in the list view might represent complex objects and that is shown in the column is either the object default property or any other property that can be deep inside the properties tree. Also this step involve find out what is the type of the value being displayed on the list view, if the value is a string I will evaluate its value converted to upper cases using the function upper from the criteria language, if the search value is not a string but a number I will try to cast it to the type of the display column, if the cast is not invalid I will evaluate the search value as a number
  5. Set the new filter to the list view

You can cross reference the points above with the sample code below

 

   using System;
   using System.Collections.Generic;
   using System.Diagnostics;
   using System.Linq;
   using System.Text;
   using DevExpress.Data.Filtering;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Actions;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Editors;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Layout;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model.NodeGenerators;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.SystemModule;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Templates;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Utils;
   using DevExpress.Persistent.Base;
   using DevExpress.Persistent.Validation;

   public class FilterControllerCaseInsensitive : ViewController<ListView>
   {
       public FilterControllerCaseInsensitive()
       {

       }
       FilterController standardFilterController;
       protected override void OnActivated()
       {
           standardFilterController = Frame.GetController<FilterController>();
           if (standardFilterController == null)
               return;

           //we should wire the execution of the filter
           standardFilterController.FullTextFilterAction.Execute += FullTextFilterAction_Execute;



       }
       protected override void OnDeactivated()
       {
           base.OnDeactivated();
           if (standardFilterController == null)
               return;

           //we should unwire the execution of the filter
           standardFilterController.FullTextFilterAction.Execute -= FullTextFilterAction_Execute;
       }


       private void FullTextFilterAction_Execute(object sender, ParametrizedActionExecuteEventArgs e)
       {
           //we locate filter with the key FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName then we convert it to case insensitive
           if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(e.ParameterCurrentValue as string) && View.CollectionSource.Criteria.ContainsKey(FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName))
               View.CollectionSource.Criteria[FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName] = GetCaseInsensitiveCriteria(e.ParameterCurrentValue, View.CollectionSource.Criteria[FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName]);
       }


       private CriteriaOperator GetCaseInsensitiveCriteria(object searchValue, CriteriaOperator initialCriteria)
       {

           //we get a list of all the properties that can be involved in the filter
           var SearchProperties = standardFilterController.GetFullTextSearchProperties();
           //we declare a model class and a property name,the values on this variables will change if we property involve is a navigation property (another persistent object)
           IModelClass ModelClass = null;
           string PropertyName = string.Empty;

           //we declare a list of operators to contains new operators we are going to create
           List<CriteriaOperator> Operator = new List<CriteriaOperator>();
           //we iterate all the properties
           foreach (var CurrentProperty in SearchProperties)
           {
               //here we split the name with a dot, if length is greater than 1 it means its a navigation properties, beware that this may fail with a deep tree of properties like category.subcategory.categoryname
               var Split = CurrentProperty.Split('.');
               if (Split.Length > 1)
               {

                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}","its a complex property"));
                   var CurrentClass = this.View.Model.ModelClass;
                   for (int i = 0; i < Split.Length; i++)
                   {

                       //if its a navigation property we locate the type in the BOModel
                       IModelMember member = CurrentClass.OwnMembers.Where(m => m.Name == Split[i]).FirstOrDefault();
                       //then we set the model class and property name to the values of the navigation property like category.name where category is the model class and name is the property
                       CurrentClass = this.Application.Model.BOModel.GetClass(member.Type);
                       if (CurrentClass == null)
                           continue;

                       ModelClass = CurrentClass;
                       PropertyName = Split[i + 1];
                     

                   }
                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "ModelClass", ModelClass.Name));
                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "PropertyName", PropertyName));
                   
                   
                  

               }
               else
               {
                   //else the model class will be the current class where the filter is executing, and the property will be the current property we are evaluating
                   ModelClass = this.View.Model.ModelClass;
                   PropertyName = CurrentProperty;
               }

               //we look for the property on the class model own member
               var Property = ModelClass.OwnMembers.Where(m => m.Name == PropertyName).FirstOrDefault();
               if (Property != null)
               {
                   //if the property is a string it means that we can set it to upper case
                   if (Property.Type == typeof(string))
                   {
                       searchValue = searchValue.ToString().ToUpper();
                       //we create an operator where we set the value of the property to upper before we compare it, also we change the comparison value to upper
                       CriteriaOperator Operand = CriteriaOperator.Parse("Contains(Upper(" + CurrentProperty + "), ?)", searchValue);
                       //we added to the list of operators that will concatenate with OR
                       Operator.Add(Operand);
                   }
                   else
                   {
                       //if the property is not a string we need to try to cast the value to the correct type so we do a catch try, if we manage to cast the value it will be added to the operators list
                       try
                       {

                           var ConvertedType = Convert.ChangeType(searchValue, Property.Type);
                           CriteriaOperator operand = new BinaryOperator(CurrentProperty, ConvertedType, BinaryOperatorType.Equal);
                           Operator.Add(operand);
                       }
                       catch (Exception)
                       {

                           //silent exception, this will happen if the casting was not successful so we won't add the operand on this case
                       }
                   }




               }
           }

           //we concatenate everything with an OR 
           var alloperators = CriteriaOperator.Or(Operator.ToArray());
           Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "alloperators", alloperators));
           return alloperators;
       }


   }