After discovering that tools were silently burning my context window, I had a new problem:

How do I keep powerful agents without paying the cost of massive schemas?

The answer did not come from AI.

It came from something much older.

πŸ‘‰ The command line.

🧠 The Problem with Traditional Tools

Most agent tools today are defined with JSON schemas, nested parameters, verbose descriptions, and strict typing.

They look clean to us as developers.

But to an LLM?

πŸ‘‰ They are heavy prompt payloads.

Every request includes:

  • full schema
  • all parameters
  • all descriptions

Even if the user only says:

β€œorder coffee”

πŸ’₯ Why This Does Not Scale

Let’s say you have:

  • 30 tools
  • each with 800 tokens

That means:

πŸ‘‰ 24,000 tokens before the user even speaks

And most of those tokens are:

  • never used
  • rarely relevant
  • repeated every time

πŸ” Rethinking Tools

So I asked myself:

Do tools really need to be JSON schemas?

Or…

πŸ‘‰ Do they just need to be understandable commands?

⚑ Enter CLI-Style Tools

Instead of this:

{
  "name": "create_order",
  "parameters": {
    "userId": "...",
    "productId": "...",
    "quantity": "..."
  }
}

You define tools like this:

create_order uid pid qty

Or even:

order coffee size=large sugar=0

🧬 Why This Works

Because LLMs are incredibly good at:

  • parsing text
  • understanding intent
  • filling structured patterns

You do not need:

  • deep JSON
  • verbose schemas
  • long descriptions

πŸ‘‰ You just need clear syntax

πŸ“‰ Token Cost Comparison

JSON Tool

~800–1500 tokens

CLI Tool

~10–30 tokens

πŸ‘‰ That is a 50x–100x reduction

🧠 Less Structure, Better Reasoning

With CLI tools:

  • fewer tokens means more room for conversation
  • simpler format means easier decisions
  • less noise means better accuracy

The model does not need to:

  • parse nested JSON
  • match schemas
  • validate deep structures

It just:

πŸ‘‰ generates a command

βš™οΈ How It Looks in Practice

User says:

β€œI want a large coffee with no sugar”

Agent outputs:

order_coffee size=large sugar=0

Your backend:

  • parses the string
  • validates parameters
  • executes the action

🧩 You Move Complexity Out of the Model

This is the key shift:

Before:

  • the model handles structure
  • the model handles validation
  • the model handles formatting

After:

  • the model generates intent
  • your code handles everything else

πŸ‘‰ Which is exactly what we want as engineers

πŸš€ Benefits for Real Systems

If you are building something like:

  • WhatsApp or Telegram agents
  • multi-domain assistants

CLI tools give you:

  • massive token savings
  • faster responses
  • lower cost per user
  • better scalability
  • simpler tool definitions

⚠️ Trade-offs

CLI tools are not magic.

You lose:

  • strict schema validation in the prompt
  • automatic argument formatting
  • some guardrails

So you must:

  • validate inputs in your backend
  • handle errors gracefully
  • design clean command syntax

🧠 Best Practices

1. Keep commands short

order_coffee
book_yoga
pay_invoice

2. Use key=value pairs

book_yoga date=2026-03-28 time=10:00

3. Avoid ambiguity

Bad:

order stuff

Good:

order_food item=pizza size=large

4. Build a parser layer in C#

This fits perfectly with a .NET stack:

  • Regex or tokenizer
  • map to DTO
  • validate
  • execute

5. Combine with routing

The best setup looks like this:

Router β†’ Domain β†’ CLI tools

Now you get:

  • small toolsets
  • tiny prompts
  • efficient agents

πŸ’‘ The Big Insight

After all this, I realized:

JSON schemas are for machines.
CLI commands are for language models.

🏁 Conclusion

The goal is not to remove tools.

The goal is to:

πŸ‘‰ make tools cheaper to think about

CLI-style tools:

  • reduce tokens
  • simplify reasoning
  • scale better

And most importantly:


They let your agent focus on what actually matters β€” understanding the user.