Head Content Injection in .NET 8 Blazor Web Apps

Head Content Injection in .NET 8 Blazor Web Apps

My journey with Microsoft Semantic Kernel marked the beginning of a new adventure: stepping out of my comfort zone as a backend developer to create applications with user interfaces, rather than just building apps for unit and integration testing.

I naturally chose Blazor as my UI framework, and I’ll be sharing my frontend development experiences here. Sometimes it can be frustratingly difficult to accomplish seemingly simple tasks (like centering a div!), but AI assistants like GitHub Copilot have been incredibly helpful in reducing those pain points.

One of my recent challenges involved programmatically including JavaScript and CSS in Blazor applications. I prefer an automated approach rather than manually adding tags to HTML. Back in the .NET 5 era, I wrote an article about using tag helpers for this purpose, which you can find here

However, I recently discovered that my original approach no longer works. I’ve been developing several prototypes using the new DevExpress Chat component, and many of these prototypes include custom components that require JavaScript and CSS. Despite my attempts, I couldn’t get these components to work with the tag helpers, and the reason wasn’t immediately obvious. During the Thanksgiving break, I decided to investigate this issue, and I’d like to share what I found.

With the release of .NET 8, Blazor introduced a new web app template that unifies Blazor Server and WebAssembly into a single project structure. This change affects how we inject content into the document’s head section, particularly when working with Tag Helpers or components.

Understanding the Changes

In previous versions of Blazor, we typically worked with _Host.cshtml for server-side rendering, where traditional ASP.NET Core Tag Helpers could target the <head> element directly. The new .NET 8 Blazor Web App template uses App.razor as the root component and introduces the <HeadOutlet> component for managing head content.

Approach 1: Adapting Tag Helpers

If you’re migrating existing Tag Helpers or creating new ones for head content injection, you’ll need to modify them to target HeadOutlet instead of the head element:


using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers;

namespace YourNamespace
{
    [HtmlTargetElement("HeadOutlet")]
    public class CustomScriptTagHelper : TagHelper
    {
        public override void Process(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
        {
            output.PostContent.AppendHtml(
                "<script src=\"_content/YourLibrary/js/script.js\"></script>"
            );
        }
    }
}
    

Remember to register your Tag Helper in _Imports.razor:

@addTagHelper *, YourLibrary

Approach 2: Using Blazor Components (Recommended)

While adapting Tag Helpers works, Blazor offers a more idiomatic approach using components and the HeadContent component. This approach aligns better with Blazor’s component-based architecture:


@namespace YourNamespace
@implements IComponentRenderMode

<HeadContent>
    <script src="_content/YourLibrary/js/script.js"></script>
</HeadContent>
    

To use this component in your App.razor:


<head>
    <!-- Other head elements -->
    <HeadOutlet @rendermode="RenderModeForPage" />
    <YourScriptComponent @rendermode="RenderModeForPage" />
</head>
    

Benefits of the Component Approach

  • Better Integration: Components work seamlessly with Blazor’s rendering model
  • Render Mode Support: Easy to control rendering based on the current render mode (Interactive Server, WebAssembly, or Auto)
  • Dynamic Content: Can leverage Blazor’s full component lifecycle and state management
  • Type Safety: Provides compile-time checking and better tooling support

Best Practices

  • Prefer the component-based approach for new development
  • Use Tag Helpers only when migrating existing code or when you need specific ASP.NET Core pipeline integration
  • Always specify the @rendermode attribute to ensure proper rendering in different scenarios
  • Place custom head content components after HeadOutlet to ensure proper ordering

Conclusion

While both approaches work in .NET 8 Blazor Web Apps, the component-based approach using HeadContent provides a more natural fit with Blazor’s architecture and offers better maintainability and flexibility. When building new applications, consider using components unless you have a specific need for Tag Helper functionality.

Understanding AppDomains in .NET Framework and .NET 5 to 8

Understanding AppDomains in .NET Framework and .NET 5 to 8

Understanding AppDomains in .NET Framework and .NET 5 to 8

AppDomains, or Application Domains, have been a fundamental part of isolation and security in the .NET Framework, allowing multiple applications to run under a single process without affecting each other. However, the introduction of .NET Core and its evolution through .NET 5 to 8 has brought significant changes to how isolation and application boundaries are handled. This article will explore the concept of AppDomains in the .NET Framework, their transition and replacement in .NET 5 to 8, and provide code examples to illustrate these differences.

AppDomains in .NET Framework

In the .NET Framework, AppDomains served as an isolation boundary for applications, providing a secure and stable environment for code execution. They enabled developers to load and unload assemblies without affecting the entire application, facilitating application updates, and minimizing downtime.

Creating an AppDomain

using System;

namespace NetFrameworkAppDomains
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            // Create a new application domain
            AppDomain newDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("NewAppDomain");

            // Load an assembly into the application domain
            newDomain.ExecuteAssembly("MyAssembly.exe");

            // Unload the application domain
            AppDomain.Unload(newDomain);
        }
    }
}

AppDomains in .NET 5 to 8

With the shift to .NET Core and its successors, the concept of AppDomains was deprecated, reflecting the platform’s move towards cross-platform compatibility and microservices architecture. Instead of AppDomains, .NET 5 to 8 emphasizes on assembly loading contexts for isolation and the use of containers (like Docker) for application separation.

AssemblyLoadContext in .NET 5 to 8

using System;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Runtime.Loader;

namespace NetCoreAssemblyLoading
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            // Create a new AssemblyLoadContext
            var loadContext = new AssemblyLoadContext("MyLoadContext", true);

            // Load an assembly into the context
            Assembly assembly = loadContext.LoadFromAssemblyPath("MyAssembly.dll");

            // Execute a method from the assembly (example method)
            MethodInfo methodInfo = assembly.GetType("MyNamespace.MyClass").GetMethod("MyMethod");
            methodInfo.Invoke(null, null);

            // Unload the AssemblyLoadContext
            loadContext.Unload();
        }
    }
}

Differences and Considerations

  • Isolation Level: AppDomains provided process-level isolation without needing multiple processes. In contrast, AssemblyLoadContext provides a lighter-weight mechanism for loading assemblies but doesn’t offer the same isolation level. For higher isolation, .NET 5 to 8 applications are encouraged to use containers or separate processes.
  • Compatibility: AppDomains are specific to the .NET Framework and are not supported in .NET Core and its successors. Applications migrating to .NET 5 to 8 need to adapt their architecture to use AssemblyLoadContext or explore alternative isolation mechanisms like containers.
  • Performance: The move away from AppDomains to more granular assembly loading and containers reflects a shift towards microservices and cloud-native applications, where performance, scalability, and cross-platform compatibility are prioritized.

Conclusion

While the transition from AppDomains to AssemblyLoadContext and container-based isolation marks a significant shift in application architecture, it aligns with the modern development practices and requirements of .NET applications. Understanding these differences is crucial for developers migrating from the .NET Framework to .NET 5 to