What is an application framework?

Let’s try to define what is an application framework, for that we will check how famous website defines the term “Application Framework”

From Wikipedia 

In computer programming, an application framework[1] consists of a software framework used by software developers to implement the standard structure of application software.[2]

From techopedia

An application framework is a software library that provides a fundamental structure to support the development of applications for a specific environment. An application framework acts as the skeletal support to build an application.

Now my own definition of an application framework

An application framework is a set of tools, components and design patterns that allow the programmer to develop an application for a well define pourpose (like a business application, a game etc..). The main pourpse of an application framework should be reduce the development time and allow the developer to focus on the main pourpouse of the application instead of the application infrastructure

That is all for now, as you can see the concept is really simple but as they say “devil lies on the details”. In the upcoming post, we will define the parts of an application framework.

 

XAF FilterController case insensitive search

Sometimes you are asked by a customer to implement a functionality that you have already created in the past from someone else.

In this case, a customer and dear friend from Italy asked me “Jose, can we make the XAF filter case insensitive?”

And my answer was yes, I have done in the past for a customer in El Salvador. At that time the approach we used was to save everything in uppercases and do all the searches in uppercases also

I didn’t like that approach at all, so it was time get creative again.

As always I start my research by spending some time reading tickets at https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/ which is the greatest source of information for all things related to DevExpress

Here is what I found

  1. https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q356778/how-can-i-activate-case-insensitive-search-in-lookup-views this approach actually works but the problem is that the name of the fields are hardcoded
  2. https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q343797/root-listview-filterbytext-include-the-collection-propertys this second approach just append extra nodes to the criteria so its also not good but what I have learned with this example is when is the right moment to alter the criteria.

My first idea was to edit the criteria that were sent to the collection source that means that I need a way to get the values of each node on the criteria, so I can edit them one by one. After some more research, this is what I have found

https://www.devexpress.com/Support/Center/Question/Details/Q539396/criteriaoperator-how-to-get-list-of-parameters-and-their-values

this approach seems perfect to get the properties and values of each node till test it and find out this

Michael (DevExpress Support)6 years ago

It is possible to write a hierarchy walker or visitor, but only for a specific subset of criteria operators.

What Michael means is that only you can only get the values of simple criteria and by simple, I mean the ones that do not involve functions. So, I was set back to step one again.

So, I’m back to step one but let’s see what I’ve learned from the other tickets

  1. I know the exact moment when the criteria are evaluated
  2. I know the criteria that are evaluated and how many nodes it contains
  3. I know which the possible properties are involved in the creation of the criteria

Now this is the flow that I will use to make the search case insensitive

  1. Locate the controller where the search action lives, for that, I can use the property frame and the method get controller
  2. Interrupt the search action, for that, I will wire the event execute of the FilterController FullTextFilterAction action
  3. Find out what are the possible properties that I can use to build the search criteria for that I will use GetFullTextSearchProperties
  4. Build the new criteria, this is somehow tricky because the properties shown in the list view might represent complex objects and that is shown in the column is either the object default property or any other property that can be deep inside the properties tree. Also this step involve find out what is the type of the value being displayed on the list view, if the value is a string I will evaluate its value converted to upper cases using the function upper from the criteria language, if the search value is not a string but a number I will try to cast it to the type of the display column, if the cast is not invalid I will evaluate the search value as a number
  5. Set the new filter to the list view

You can cross reference the points above with the sample code below

 

   using System;
   using System.Collections.Generic;
   using System.Diagnostics;
   using System.Linq;
   using System.Text;
   using DevExpress.Data.Filtering;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Actions;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Editors;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Layout;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Model.NodeGenerators;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.SystemModule;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Templates;
   using DevExpress.ExpressApp.Utils;
   using DevExpress.Persistent.Base;
   using DevExpress.Persistent.Validation;

   public class FilterControllerCaseInsensitive : ViewController<ListView>
   {
       public FilterControllerCaseInsensitive()
       {

       }
       FilterController standardFilterController;
       protected override void OnActivated()
       {
           standardFilterController = Frame.GetController<FilterController>();
           if (standardFilterController == null)
               return;

           //we should wire the execution of the filter
           standardFilterController.FullTextFilterAction.Execute += FullTextFilterAction_Execute;



       }
       protected override void OnDeactivated()
       {
           base.OnDeactivated();
           if (standardFilterController == null)
               return;

           //we should unwire the execution of the filter
           standardFilterController.FullTextFilterAction.Execute -= FullTextFilterAction_Execute;
       }


       private void FullTextFilterAction_Execute(object sender, ParametrizedActionExecuteEventArgs e)
       {
           //we locate filter with the key FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName then we convert it to case insensitive
           if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(e.ParameterCurrentValue as string) && View.CollectionSource.Criteria.ContainsKey(FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName))
               View.CollectionSource.Criteria[FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName] = GetCaseInsensitiveCriteria(e.ParameterCurrentValue, View.CollectionSource.Criteria[FilterController.FullTextSearchCriteriaName]);
       }


       private CriteriaOperator GetCaseInsensitiveCriteria(object searchValue, CriteriaOperator initialCriteria)
       {

           //we get a list of all the properties that can be involved in the filter
           var SearchProperties = standardFilterController.GetFullTextSearchProperties();
           //we declare a model class and a property name,the values on this variables will change if we property involve is a navigation property (another persistent object)
           IModelClass ModelClass = null;
           string PropertyName = string.Empty;

           //we declare a list of operators to contains new operators we are going to create
           List<CriteriaOperator> Operator = new List<CriteriaOperator>();
           //we iterate all the properties
           foreach (var CurrentProperty in SearchProperties)
           {
               //here we split the name with a dot, if length is greater than 1 it means its a navigation properties, beware that this may fail with a deep tree of properties like category.subcategory.categoryname
               var Split = CurrentProperty.Split('.');
               if (Split.Length > 1)
               {

                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}","its a complex property"));
                   var CurrentClass = this.View.Model.ModelClass;
                   for (int i = 0; i < Split.Length; i++)
                   {

                       //if its a navigation property we locate the type in the BOModel
                       IModelMember member = CurrentClass.OwnMembers.Where(m => m.Name == Split[i]).FirstOrDefault();
                       //then we set the model class and property name to the values of the navigation property like category.name where category is the model class and name is the property
                       CurrentClass = this.Application.Model.BOModel.GetClass(member.Type);
                       if (CurrentClass == null)
                           continue;

                       ModelClass = CurrentClass;
                       PropertyName = Split[i + 1];
                     

                   }
                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "ModelClass", ModelClass.Name));
                   Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "PropertyName", PropertyName));
                   
                   
                  

               }
               else
               {
                   //else the model class will be the current class where the filter is executing, and the property will be the current property we are evaluating
                   ModelClass = this.View.Model.ModelClass;
                   PropertyName = CurrentProperty;
               }

               //we look for the property on the class model own member
               var Property = ModelClass.OwnMembers.Where(m => m.Name == PropertyName).FirstOrDefault();
               if (Property != null)
               {
                   //if the property is a string it means that we can set it to upper case
                   if (Property.Type == typeof(string))
                   {
                       searchValue = searchValue.ToString().ToUpper();
                       //we create an operator where we set the value of the property to upper before we compare it, also we change the comparison value to upper
                       CriteriaOperator Operand = CriteriaOperator.Parse("Contains(Upper(" + CurrentProperty + "), ?)", searchValue);
                       //we added to the list of operators that will concatenate with OR
                       Operator.Add(Operand);
                   }
                   else
                   {
                       //if the property is not a string we need to try to cast the value to the correct type so we do a catch try, if we manage to cast the value it will be added to the operators list
                       try
                       {

                           var ConvertedType = Convert.ChangeType(searchValue, Property.Type);
                           CriteriaOperator operand = new BinaryOperator(CurrentProperty, ConvertedType, BinaryOperatorType.Equal);
                           Operator.Add(operand);
                       }
                       catch (Exception)
                       {

                           //silent exception, this will happen if the casting was not successful so we won't add the operand on this case
                       }
                   }




               }
           }

           //we concatenate everything with an OR 
           var alloperators = CriteriaOperator.Or(Operator.ToArray());
           Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}:{1}", "alloperators", alloperators));
           return alloperators;
       }


   }

 

 

 

BIT.Xpo.Observables Nuget

An observable implementation of XpCollection and XPPageSelector.

After 15 years, DevExpress has finally made XPO available free-of-charge. If you’re not familiar with XPO, you can learn more about its feature set here. If you’ve used XPO in the past or are familiar with capabilities, you will love this.

As we already know a Xamarin ListView is populated with data using the ItemsSource property, which can accept any collection implementing IEnumerable but if we want the ListView to automatically update as items are added, removed or changed in the underlying list, you’ll need to use an ObservableCollection. Here is where XpoObservableCollection becomes the best friend for all the XPO fans out there.

XpoObservableCollection inherit from an XPCollection so to use, it is exactly as you would use an XPCollection, the only difference is that the XpoObservableCollection refresh the state of ListViews on Xamarin Forms.

XamarinXpoPageSelector takes it a step further by internally implementing XPPageSelector and presenting the XpoObservableCollection as a pageable collection. With this in mind, on the constructor of the XamarinXpoPageSelector  you need to pass the following parameters:

SortingCollection sorting = new SortingCollection();
sorting.Add(new SortProperty("Your Property", SortingDirection.Ascending));
XPCollection <Your Class> Collection = new XPCollection <YourClass>(UnitOfWork);
Collection.Sorting = sorting;

XamarinXpoPageSelector <YourClass> selector = new XamarinXpoPageSelector <YourClass> (Collection,10, XpoObservablePageSelectorBehavior.AppendPage);
       
this.listView.ItemsSource = selector.ObservableData;
  • Collection = An instance of XPCollection.
  • 10 = Page Size by default.
  • XpoObservablePageSelectorBehavior = AppendPage or SinglePage.

Use Append in case you want to add the results of the new page to the collection or Single page to clear the last page results before showing the new page.

And that’s it. The same awesome ObservableRangeCollection (from MVVM Helpers) that adds important methods such as AddRange, RemoveRange, Replace, and ReplaceRange, it is now available in XPO and of course, it is open source so go and take a look behind the curtains.

https://github.com/egarim/BIT.Xpo.Observables

https://www.nuget.org/packages/BIT.Xpo.Observables/

Until next time. Xpo out!

XPO and database replication

After 15 years of working with XPO, I have seen many tickets asking if XPO is capable of doing data replication and all the time DevExpress team answer those tickets saying that replication its out of the scope of XPO and that it’s actually true.

So, to start talking about database replication lets try to define what “replication” means. Here is the definition of replication according to Wikipedia

“A computational task is typically replicated in space, i.e. executed on separate devices, or it could be replicated in time, if it is executed repeatedly on a single device. Replication in space or in time is often linked to scheduling algorithms”

The keywords on the above statement are task, space and time, so to replicate a database operation we need to know the following information

  • What was the task?
  • Who performed the task?
  • When was the task performed?
  • Who needs to know about the task what was performed?

Now let’s think what are the steps that any traditional database does, in order to replicate the data between instances

  • It shares a copy of the database schema to the other instances/locations/devices
  • It logs the DML statements that happened to a main instance/location/device
  • It broadcast the statements on this log to the other instances/locations/devices
  • it processes the statements on the target instance/locations/devices

Now the question is, can we do the same with XPO?

thanks to the great architecture develop by the XPO Team, the answer is a big YES!!!

so, let’s compare how you can match traditional database replication with XPO

Traditional database replication XPO database replication
1 Share a copy of the database schema. In XPO we can re-create a database schema using the method UpdateSchema from the Session class.
2 Logs the DML statements. In XPO we can keep track of the BaseStatement at the DataLayer level.
3 Broadcast the statements

 

 

We can transport the log of statements using any of the dot net network technologies like WCF, remoting or Web API.
4 Process the statements on the target instance, device or location

 

 

To process any kind of BaseStatement we can use the XPO DataLayer on the target instance, device or location

 

So, it looks like DotNet and XPO provide us of all the necessary infrastructure to do a database replication so why not give it a try right?